As AI transforms workplaces across America and Europe, professionals face unprecedented challenges. From doctors challenged by patients using ChatGPT to copywriters whose work is rewritten by AI tools, professional expertise is being deconstructed. This article explores how AI is reshaping professional credibility and what it means for the future of work.

Press enter or click to view image in full size

The AI Tsunami: Professionalism Under Siege

Have you been forced to use AI at work? In recent years, AI has swept through workplaces across America and Europe like a tidal wave. Copywriters, strategists, designers, journalists, software engineers — no profession seems immune. According to the 2025 R&D Big Data Report, over 90% of engineers now use AI programming tools, demonstrating the pervasive nature of AI adoption across all professional domains.

Initially, excitement prevailed: AI promised to boost efficiency and expand capabilities. From specialized image generation tools like nano banana2 to general-purpose AI assistants, the technology landscape has evolved rapidly. But as AI adoption grows, professionals are discovering unsettling realities. The “professional skills” we once relied upon are becoming increasingly “useless.” Hard work can be dismissed with a simple command: “Let AI fix it.” Professionalism in the AI era is being systematically deconstructed.

The Medical Field: When AI Challenges Medical Authority

In 2025, OpenEvidence, often dubbed the “doctor version of ChatGPT,” reached a $12 billion valuation, highlighting how deeply AI has penetrated the medical field. This AI-powered medical platform has become so sophisticated that patients increasingly challenge their physicians’ treatment plans based on its recommendations.

A physician at a New York hospital shared a disturbing trend on social media. After prescribing medication, patients frequently question his treatment plan, stating: “OpenEvidence says that’s not the right approach” or “ChatGPT suggests a different medication.”

This scenario mirrors the early internet era, when doctors dreaded patients who came armed with Google searches. “You prescribed this medication, but I read on WebMD that this condition should be treated differently.” Now, “Google” has been replaced by “AI tools like OpenEvidence,” and the erosion of professional authority has accelerated.

In Silicon Valley’s telemedicine platforms, patients present AI-generated medical reports, demanding treatments that algorithms recommend. The fundamental trust between doctor and patient — built on years of medical education and clinical experience — is being undermined by AI tools that, while powerful, lack medical nuance, context, and the ability to consider individual patient histories comprehensively.

The Copywriting Crisis: “Let AI Fix It”

“Upload this draft to AI and let it polish it.” This is the phrase that Sarah, a brand copywriter at a San Francisco tech company, hears repeatedly from her manager. No feedback, no specific issues, no direction — just an insistence that AI improve everything.

Sarah’s career had been progressing smoothly until her manager shared an article about AI productivity tools in the company Slack channel. Since then, the nightmare began. “Management requires everyone to use AI. Don’t write drafts yourself — use AI for everything,” Sarah explains. “My manager asks ChatGPT about everything. Watching him work feels like watching someone consult a fortune teller.”

If it were merely a requirement to use AI, the impact might be manageable — Sarah already uses various AI tools in her daily work. What truly angers her is the disrespect AI usage shows toward professional work.

“Our company recently launched a new product requiring a comprehensive marketing campaign. But after submitting all promotional copy and product descriptions, management feeds everything to AI, returns a completely unrecognizable version, and demands we execute it.”

“It feels like AI is plagiarizing our work,” Sarah believes. AI essentially modifies their output, but management won’t remember the original professional effort. They only remember that humans spent days producing inferior work, while AI generated something “better” in minutes.

Moreover, Sarah argues that AI’s revisions aren’t perfect. “Copywriting and editorial content contain subjective elements. Different people have different preferences. While AI sometimes produces good content, it doesn’t always align with established brand voice or marketing strategy.”

“But management doesn’t care about these nuances. They believe AI’s content is superior. Yet we have KPIs to meet, so for the sake of results, we must adjust our strategies. It’s like making dumplings just to justify buying vinegar.”

Journalism: When Sources Rewrite Interviews

Similar challenges plague media professionals. After completing an interview with a tech CEO, Emily, a journalist at a major New York publication, prepared the Q&A version for confirmation as usual. To her surprise, the interviewee returned a version so heavily edited it was practically a new article.

The CEO proudly explained that he had used AI to rewrite the content, claiming it would be “more shareable” and attract more readers. Emily stared at the text, which now resembled a press release rather than an interview, and couldn’t comprehend how this version would generate more engagement.

This phenomenon extends beyond text-based work. In London, Michael, a designer at a creative agency, faces similar pressures. “Management constantly demands AI-generated design assets. Adobe’s 2024 AI tools in Photoshop and Illustrator have revolutionized design workflows, but our work focuses on event posters and key visuals — these aren’t fine art pieces, and AI struggles to generate appropriate content.”

Adobe’s latest AI features, including Generative Fill in Photoshop and Text to Vector Graphic in Illustrator, have made it possible for non-designers to create seemingly professional visuals. However, these tools often miss the strategic thinking and brand consistency that professional designers provide. Before the holiday season, Michael used AI to generate promotional materials. But management had specific requirements for character positioning, attire, and other details. These elements are interconnected — changing one aspect affects the entire composition. To achieve satisfactory results, Michael spent an entire day repeatedly generating variations, essentially playing AI roulette.

“Since we started using AI, management constantly tells us our work isn’t as good as AI’s,” Sarah reports. AI has indeed changed how we work, but not for the better. With AI, we face more pressure than ever. The irony is that while Adobe’s AI tools have democratized design capabilities, they’ve also created unrealistic expectations about what AI can achieve without human expertise.

The Deconstruction of Professionalism

These cases reveal a difficult truth: in the AI era, professional expertise is being deconstructed.

Previously, producing poster designs, PR materials, or interview content required certain thresholds — specific technical skills, accumulated experience. But with AI, including image generation platforms like nano banana2 anyone can quickly generate seemingly acceptable results regardless of prior experience or domain knowledge.

This deconstruction of professional capability has two effects. On one hand, it empowers many individuals, enhancing their abilities and creating “super individuals.” On the other hand, it creates the illusion that “anyone can do this,” leading to the dismissal of professional expertise.

Consider Emily’s experience: the interview subject believed AI could rewrite content better than a professional journalist. This reflects a broader trend where AI-generated content is perceived as inherently superior, regardless of context, nuance, or brand alignment.

The “I Can Do That Too” Illusion

The accessibility of AI tools has created a dangerous misconception: that professional skills are no longer valuable. This “I can do that too” mentality undermines years of education, training, and experience.

In Hollywood, screenwriters face similar challenges. Producers increasingly demand AI-generated scripts, believing algorithms can produce marketable content faster than human writers. But AI lacks understanding of character development, emotional arcs, and cultural context — elements that distinguish great stories from mediocre ones.

In European design studios, junior designers find their work dismissed by clients who believe AI can generate “better” designs. But AI cannot replicate the strategic thinking, brand understanding, and creative problem-solving that professional designers bring to projects.

The Hidden Costs of AI Reliance

While AI offers undeniable efficiency gains, overreliance carries significant risks:

Quality degradation: AI-generated content often lacks depth, nuance, and strategic thinking that professionals provide.

Brand inconsistency: AI struggles to maintain consistent brand voice across different content types and platforms.

Loss of innovation: AI works by analyzing existing patterns, potentially limiting creative breakthroughs.

Ethical concerns: AI can generate misleading or inappropriate content without human oversight.

Professional devaluation: Dismissing professional expertise leads to a workforce that lacks deep knowledge and critical thinking skills.

The Path Forward: Reimagining Professionalism in the AI Era

The solution isn’t to reject AI, but to reimagine how professionals and AI can collaborate effectively.

Augment, don’t replace: AI should enhance professional capabilities, not replace professional judgment. The best outcomes come from human-AI collaboration, not AI domination.

Context matters: Professionals understand context, nuance, and strategic objectives that AI cannot fully comprehend. This expertise remains invaluable.

Quality over speed: While AI offers speed, professional work offers quality, strategy, and alignment with business objectives.

Continuous learning: Professionals must embrace AI tools while maintaining their core expertise and critical thinking skills.

Professionalism Evolved, Not Eliminated

AI is not killing professionalism — it’s transforming it. The professionals who thrive in this new era will be those who leverage AI while maintaining their core expertise, critical thinking, and strategic judgment.

The future belongs to professionals who understand that AI is a powerful tool, not a replacement for human expertise. By combining AI’s efficiency with professional insight, we can achieve outcomes that neither humans nor machines could accomplish alone.

Professionalism isn’t dead — it’s evolving. And those who adapt will lead the future of work.